Friday, July 1, 2011

chicago white sox skyline

images Chicago White Sox Parade chicago white sox skyline. Chicago White Sox Section 162
  • Chicago White Sox Section 162


    • Rayyan
    10-05 12:40 PM
    Yes its a new rule,is it possible to make passport for her(unmarried) instead of married and go for stamping oh H4,does it create any problem for stamping?
    Please let me know.



    wallpaper Chicago White Sox Section 162 chicago white sox skyline. Chicago White Sox vs.
  • Chicago White Sox vs.


    • vinoddas
    09-06 03:04 AM
    I am planning to get religiously married by end of next year, 2009. But I am considering doing a quick court marriage in the next week since my dates are current. I have a couple questions regarding time frame:
    1. If I do get my GC soon, then I need to apply for following-to-join. Is there a time limit for this? Can I do it as late as I want, as long as the spouse doesnt come to US before?
    2. If I do not get GC for a while, is there a time frame after marriage before which I have to apply for my spouse's 485 as a dependent? Does she also need to be on H4 and in US before applying for 485?

    Thanks a lot for all the help. I am relatively clueless about this marriage related GC business.



    chicago white sox skyline. 2011 Chicago White Sox Winter
  • 2011 Chicago White Sox Winter


    • freedom1
    05-22 01:02 PM
    This is the scenario:

    1. Husband becomes a LPR this year.
    2. Wife still undocumented.
    3. Wife was working long time ago, but became a housewife for the past 6 years, so no work.

    How would the wife adjust her status under the new CIR if she was not working for the past 6 years?
    Would she have to wait until the husband is able to petition her through other regular means?

    Any ideas or is it too early to tell how USCIS will issue it's regulations about CIR?

    Freedom1 :confused:



    2011 Chicago White Sox vs. chicago white sox skyline. New Era 59 Fifty White Sox
  • New Era 59 Fifty White Sox


    • santa123
    06-10 09:26 PM
    I was just wondering why legal immigration is not generating any interest with the beloved politicians in this country. Inside the mind of these politicians... I guess their agenda is very clear.

    Immigration support for illegals = hispanic votes = reelection!
    Immigration support for widows = sympathy votes = reelection!
    Immigration support for same sex partners = more votes = reelection!
    Immigration support for serving the military = Show of patriotism = society respect!
    ...
    ...

    But,
    Immigration support for legal immigrants = what's the use = not a penny worth!!!

    Oh God help us!


    more...

    chicago white sox skyline. wallpaper Chicago White Sox BR
  • wallpaper Chicago White Sox BR


    • T-O
    04-08 04:04 AM
    here's some.. :P

    I couldn't fit a bigger smile on there. :D Cowboy bebop :D Wiejie! :P



    chicago white sox skyline. 2010 Chicago White Sox hat
  • 2010 Chicago White Sox hat


    • microbe
    November 10th, 2005, 10:45 PM
    Looks like a nice piece of equipment. Pricing I've seen is $1,699US.
    file child's 485 after the principal [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : file child's 485 after the principal



    more...

    chicago white sox skyline. 1919 chicago white sox logo. Chicago White Sox. Chicago White Sox.
  • 1919 chicago white sox logo. Chicago White Sox. Chicago White Sox.


    • ita
    02-15 03:08 PM
    My employer says that he is going to run the taxes from the state where the company is located and not from the state where I'm actually working.
    Says something changed on the company's front and the CPA advised that there won't be any problem .He's giving me all kinds of reasons about how he can't run the taxes from my state and says there won't be any problem in 485 stage.

    If called for the 485 interview we may have to bring our pay stubs to the interview .In that case would there be any problem with this scenario.?

    By the way the address I have on file for all my applications is another state (different from where I'm living and where my company is located).(If) called for an interview I guess it will be in the state which is on my applications . Does any one know if I'm right?

    Please let me know if this fine.
    Thank you.



    2010 2011 Chicago White Sox Winter chicago white sox skyline. Chicago White Sox Parade
  • Chicago White Sox Parade


    • pappu
    04-07 02:20 PM
    In one of the threads Pappu suggested a very nice idea.

    Everyone with difficult stories due to unfair immigration policies should make a youtube video and post a link here. Spoken stories will have much better effect.

    Thank you. This is a good idea. Please lead this effort. You can detail this out, answer questions and help if someone wants to know how to make one.
    Once we have lot of videos, they can be sent to media networks and reporters.


    more...

    chicago white sox skyline. pictures Milliken Chicago White Sox 11 1919 chicago white sox logo. he
  • pictures Milliken Chicago White Sox 11 1919 chicago white sox logo. he


    • actaccord
    01-17 12:43 PM
    comes up in next two years (or till unemployment goes down) will not be +ve for immigration community. Now immigration topic is of political score point not like before where there is reasonable debate was happening.



    hair New Era 59 Fifty White Sox chicago white sox skyline. 2011 2011 Nissan Skyline Gtr
  • 2011 2011 Nissan Skyline Gtr


    • flresident
    01-27 01:43 PM
    Your school's International Student Advisor should be able to give you exact information.


    more...

    chicago white sox skyline. Chicago White Sox Section 163
  • Chicago White Sox Section 163


    • jetflyer
    05-07 08:23 AM
    Friends,

    I am starting this thread for the people who are Greencard Holders and not married. Please share some thoughts for bringing their spouse here.

    IV can help in this matter.

    If all visa holders and citizens can bring their spouse instantly then why GC holder have to wait for many years after getting GC after many years.

    Thanks

    Jet



    hot wallpaper Chicago White Sox BR chicago white sox skyline. 2011 Chicago White Sox BITD 2
  • 2011 Chicago White Sox BITD 2


    • gcwait_07
    12-03 12:48 PM
    Loo's only place is KKK

    Such a asinine thing to say....esp on a public forum. Better to behave like the highly skilled/educated people we are supposed to be.


    more...

    house house Nissan Skyline Gtr R35 chicago white sox skyline. skyline tattoos. city skyline
  • skyline tattoos. city skyline


    • akashintouch
    03-07 10:07 AM
    Normally when you Get an RFE there are very goodChances of getting your Application processed pretty soon



    tattoo 2010 Chicago White Sox hat chicago white sox skyline. Chicago Skyline at Night
  • Chicago Skyline at Night


    • salvador marley
    05-01 10:18 PM
    lets forget that one then :)


    more...

    pictures 1919 chicago white sox logo. Chicago White Sox. Chicago White Sox. chicago white sox skyline. Mpls Skyline tattoo
  • Mpls Skyline tattoo


    • hydbadi
    06-26 05:06 AM
    Hello!

    I was laid off from Company A on H-1B in May 09. My EB2, India, I-140 was approved in Mar 09. Since PD is not current, I-485 has not been filed yet. Here are my questions:

    Can I retain my PD if Company A withdraws(worst case) my I-140 petition?
    If I find employment with Company B, can I still file my I-485 using Company A's I-140 petition assuming Company A provides me with an Employment Letter for future employment?
    If previous step is feasible and I-485 is approved within 180days of filing, will it pose any issues if I have to invoke AC21? (since I will be working for Company B when I file I-485 with Company A) I ask this because I have 2 yrs and 4months on my H-1B off the 6yr limit and I am afraid I might run out of H-1B time before I file I-485.


    Thanks!



    dresses 2011 Chicago White Sox BITD 2 chicago white sox skyline. Nissan Skyline Gtr R35 White.
  • Nissan Skyline Gtr R35 White.


    • singhv_1980
    01-19 11:38 AM
    I do not think so. I believe these are two separate issues and should not have any effect on the chances of your frnd securing visa.


    more...

    makeup pictures Milliken Chicago White Sox 11 1919 chicago white sox logo. he chicago white sox skyline. house Nissan Skyline Gtr R35
  • house Nissan Skyline Gtr R35


    • indygc
    09-01 02:57 PM
    Guys,

    I filed our AP & EAD on August 10th with proof of 485 filing/delivery confirmation.
    We got our receipt notices for AP 131 but unfortunately they have rejected our EAD 765 for incorretc filing fee of $180.
    They written a notice saying the correct filing fee after July 30th is $340.

    But for July VB is'nt the filing fee $180?

    I have got back my entire documents packet for 765.

    What should I do now? Should I resend the packet with a letter saying that I come under July VB? or should I send a new check for $340? Anybody gone thru similar experiences? Pls help.

    Thanks in Advance
    Indy



    girlfriend Chicago Skyline at Night chicago white sox skyline. NIKE AIR MAX SKYLINE LO TOP
  • NIKE AIR MAX SKYLINE LO TOP


    • nj4800
    07-03 04:20 PM
    I received a RFE of my I485, and was asked to declare my self-employment since Dec,31, 2006. I have been engaged in Market America Direct Sell business part-time since August 26, 2005, and have claimed buinsess lost in my tax return since 2005. In 2006, I got a 1099 form that showed $600 income from Market America. After that I didn't have any income from the business.

    My question is if I am self-employment. If so, do you have any way to resolve this issue?

    My last entry into USA is 07/05/2008, but the I-94 was not replaced at Niagara Falls port. The last entry date on my passport is still Dec, 31, 2006.

    My EAD start date is 7/31/2008.

    I am looking for an Attorney who is an expert at this case to reply my RFE and resolve my pronblem.

    Thanks



    hairstyles Chicago White Sox Section 163 chicago white sox skyline. images Chicago White Sox
  • images Chicago White Sox


    • tanyatanya
    08-07 09:46 PM
    Hi,

    I am currently on H3 visa. My 2-yr term is coming to an end. My company had initially told me that they would find me a job internally and then relocate me to another location outside of the US after my training ends.

    However, the company has not been able to find me anything in other regions, which essentially means I will be laid off. I want to know if the company is liable to pay me severance / air tickets back to my home country??

    My employer is currently saying that they are not responsible for my airfare. That provision is only for H1B's. However, if the intent of H3 visa was to bring me for training and transfer me so that I could use that knowledge somewhere else. Even in the H-3 filing papers my company stated that their intent was to provide me employment in other regions after the end of the training. I don't understand how can they leave me stranded. They should be liable for something (severance, airfare)??

    Please reply if you have any advice.



    mrajatish
    10-16 01:42 PM
    I have a question on filling up this form

    It asks for Alien Registration Number (In section 5) - can anyone tell me what to fill this up with, since I do not have Green card?

    There is a slot for I-94 admissions# which I have filled up.

    Any help will be appreciated.



    Macaca
    09-29 07:54 AM
    Dangerous Logjam on Surveillance (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/28/AR2007092801332.html) By David Ignatius (davidignatius@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 30, 2007

    The writer is co-host of PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues.

    When a nation can't solve the problems that concern its citizens, it's in trouble. And that's where America now finds itself on nearly every big issue -- from immigration to Iraq to health care to anti-terrorism policies.

    Let us focus on the last of these logjams -- over the legal rules for conducting surveillance against terrorists. There isn't a more urgent priority for the country: We face an adversary that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans if it could. But in a polarized Washington, crafting a solid compromise that has long-term bipartisan support has so far proved impossible.

    People who try to occupy a middle ground in these debates find that it doesn't exist. That reality confounded Gen. David Petraeus this month. He thought that as a professional military officer, he could serve both the administration and the Democratic Congress. Guess what? It didn't work. Democrats saw Petraeus as a representative of the Bush White House, rather than of the nation.

    Now the same meat grinder is devouring Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence. He's a career military intelligence officer who ran the National Security Agency under President Bill Clinton. As near as I can tell, the only ax he has to grind is catching terrorists. But in the vortex of Washington politics, he has become a partisan figure. An article last week in The Hill newspaper, headlined "Democrats question credibility, consistency of DNI McConnell," itemized his misstatements and supposed flip-flops as if he were running for office.

    What's weird is that the actual points of disagreement between the two sides about surveillance rules are, at this point, fairly narrow. McConnell seemed close to brokering a compromise in August, but the White House refused to allow him to sign off on the deal he had negotiated. The Bush strategy, now as ever, is to tar the Democrats as weak on terrorism. That doesn't exactly encourage bipartisanship.

    A little background may help explain this murky mess. Last year, after the revelation that the Bush administration had been conducting warrantless wiretaps, there was a broad consensus that the NSA's surveillance efforts should be brought within the legal framework of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). And in January, with a new Democratic Congress sharpening its arrows, the administration did just that. It submitted its "Terrorist Surveillance Program" to the FISA court. The heart of that program was tapping communications links that pass through the United States to monitor messages between foreigners. A first FISA judge blessed the program, but a second judge had problems.

    At that point, the Bush administration decided to seek new legislation formally authorizing the program, and the horse-trading began. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi led a team of Democrats bargaining with McConnell. The administration had two basic demands -- that Congress approve the existing practice of using U.S. communications hubs to collect intelligence about foreigners, and that Congress compel telecommunications companies to turn over records so they wouldn't face lawsuits for aiding the government.

    The Democrats agreed to these requests on Aug. 2. They also accepted three other 11th-hour demands from McConnell, including authority to extend the anti-terrorist surveillance rules to wider foreign intelligence tasks. Pelosi and the Democrats thought they had a deal, but that evening McConnell told them that the "other side" -- meaning the White House -- wanted more concessions. The deal collapsed, and the White House, sensing it had the upper hand, pushed through a more accommodating Senate bill that would have to be renewed in six months.

    The summer negotiations left bruised feelings on both sides -- that's the definition of political negotiations in Washington these days, isn't it? McConnell fanned the flames when he told the El Paso Times that "some Americans are going to die" because of the public debate about surveillance laws. The Democrats threw back spitballs of their own.

    Now McConnell and the Democrats are back in the cage. A key administration demand is retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies that agreed to help the government in what they thought was a legal program. That seems fair enough. So does the Democratic demand that the White House turn over documents that explain how these programs were created.

    A healthy political system would reach a compromise to allow aggressive surveillance of our adversaries. In the asymmetric wars of the 21st century, the fact that America owns the digital communications space is one of the few advantages we have. The challenge is to put this necessary surveillance under solid legal rules. If the two sides can't get together on this one, the public should howl bloody murder.
    Surveillance Showdown (http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010670) "Privacy" zealots want America to forgo intelligence capabilities during wartime. BY DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. AND LEE A. CASEY | Wall Street Journal, September 30, 2007


    Posted by Abriella at 2:59 AM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)